05-08-2015, 12:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2015, 12:17 PM by Canis-Major.)
Dont blame ya, but in a nutshell, it dont matter how much you divvy up the space in the chip..
For instance..
In 2000, we USED to copy an 8mb FULL flash until some bright spark decided to get the groupies behind the 'we only need 2 of these megabytes..'
Roll on 2015, chips are 256, using only 16 meg?
But we're still only copying 2?
Seems to me everything has upgraded, but the advice given by certain member's here, most of these, no longer speak on sbh.. if they do, it's cause the best left there a looong time ago..
As for your covert action, what do you think I have to hide compared to you? NOTHING, because nothing either of us knows, is worth being 'covert' about.. man, some folks here clearly need to get out more..
Allow this covert action:
From now on we'll add an image by adding an extra digit/letter to every digit/letter, of the flash, which will, when loaded into this x amount of blank space, show itself to be the third bank. This third bank will appear to be only two banks at all times, 9 megabytes in total, despite being 64meg, since 32mb is required to load 1x 16meg image's. 32 to store, 32 for loading. 32meg being the entire 'dual' flash.
So we still only require 2mb of 8mb, what is it now, 16mb in moto's?
Cough cough.. am in stitches.. all these questions dds, but I've yet to see an actual answer from you that benefit's people intead of the usual drag..
A hint.. If I can copy 256mb from what you claim is a 128mb chip, please explain?
For instance..
In 2000, we USED to copy an 8mb FULL flash until some bright spark decided to get the groupies behind the 'we only need 2 of these megabytes..'
Roll on 2015, chips are 256, using only 16 meg?
But we're still only copying 2?
Seems to me everything has upgraded, but the advice given by certain member's here, most of these, no longer speak on sbh.. if they do, it's cause the best left there a looong time ago..
As for your covert action, what do you think I have to hide compared to you? NOTHING, because nothing either of us knows, is worth being 'covert' about.. man, some folks here clearly need to get out more..
Allow this covert action:
From now on we'll add an image by adding an extra digit/letter to every digit/letter, of the flash, which will, when loaded into this x amount of blank space, show itself to be the third bank. This third bank will appear to be only two banks at all times, 9 megabytes in total, despite being 64meg, since 32mb is required to load 1x 16meg image's. 32 to store, 32 for loading. 32meg being the entire 'dual' flash.
So we still only require 2mb of 8mb, what is it now, 16mb in moto's?
Cough cough.. am in stitches.. all these questions dds, but I've yet to see an actual answer from you that benefit's people intead of the usual drag..
(05-08-2015, 12:14 PM)Canis-Major Wrote: Dont blame ya, but in a nutshell, it dont matter how much you divvy up the space in the chip..
For instance..
In 2000, we USED to copy an 8mb FULL flash until some bright spark decided to get the groupies behind the 'we only need 2 of these megabytes..'
Roll on 2015, chips are 256, using only 16 meg?
But we're still only copying 2?
Seems to me everything has upgraded, but the advice given by certain member's here, most of these, no longer speak on sbh.. if they do, it's cause the best left there a looong time ago..
As for your covert action, what do you think I have to hide compared to you? NOTHING, because nothing either of us knows, is worth being 'covert' about.. man, some folks here clearly need to get out more..
Allow this covert action:
From now on we'll add an image by adding an extra digit/letter to every digit/letter, of the flash, which will, when loaded into this x amount of blank space, show itself to be the third bank. This third bank will appear to be only two banks at all times, 9 megabytes in total, despite being 64meg, since 32mb is required to load 1x 16meg image's. 32 to store, 32 for loading. 32meg being the entire 'dual' flash.
So we still only require 2mb of 8mb, what is it now, 16mb in moto's?
Cough cough.. am in stitches.. all these questions dds, but I've yet to see an actual answer from you that benefit's people intead of the usual drag..
A hint.. If I can copy 256mb from what you claim is a 128mb chip, please explain?